|
Lire
ce site en francais
Translated from French
electronically, contains poor grammar
and misspellings.
Pentagon surveillance cctv
2001/9/11 :
here is the fraud !
I changed my mind
Instead of "here is the fraud
!", this web site's title ended
first with "where are the missing
frames ?". I kept to archives the
old
version. of the site, in which I
tried to settle several hypotheses on
the pentagon's crash of September 11
2001. I have now deeper analyses which
show that there has been a cover-up of
what happened in Washington D.C. on
9/11. This cover-up disproves the
thesis of the suicide of an Arab
hijacker with a Boeing 757. I must
write, sadly, that it enforces a
terrible hypotheses : a tricky attack
planned and executed by people from
inside the United States of America in
order to manipulate public opinion
and, finally, drive this country into
a war in Asia. Here are the materials
and the analysis.
The video
The following three pictures are
extracted from the video shown on
CNN
site, and said to origin from the
department of defense (dod) and to
have been shot by the pentagon's
parking cctv on September 11 2001.
The authentic character of this
video has never been denied by the
authorities. It is possible to remark
on image 2 that the camera has moved,
not to say "bounced on it's
support". On the upper-left and
upper-right corners of the images
appear some fuzzy details, probably
located on the glass of the booth.
This move corresponds to the arrival
at the camera's location of the
shockwave transmitted by the ground,
which propagates much faster than the
shockwave transmitted by the air. The
images have probably been cropped with
an image processing software, in order
to let them viewed in an animation
without being disturbed by this effect
of move of the camera (see the legend
cropped on the lower left part of
image 2).
Complete pictures
I recently found on
Minneapolis
/ St Paul Star Tribune.com web
site the uncropped photos, apparently
originating from AP (Associated Press
?) and published on march 7 2002. It
is obvious, on these frames, that the
camera bounces on it's support on
frame N° 2.
The camera location can be seen on
the following image (bottom right).
Some interesting places have been
indexed (in yellow). The presumed
plane trajectory has been plotted in
violet.
|
The video (animated gif) |
 |
The general impression, at
first look, is that something
very fast is happening, and
has been partially captured by
the camera. |
|
Frame 1 |
 |
Just above the yellow
cabinet (housing of the id
card reader ?) we can see a
black stuff, which suggests
the tail of the plane. At the
right of this cabinet, two
white smoke clouds. Said to be
vortexes created by the plane
and/or smoke from the engines.
Note the "free"
space between the left of the
yellow cabinet and the front
of the pentagon : the plane
must go through this space
from the position on frame 1
(partially hidden by the
yellow cabinet) to it's
supposed position inside the
Pentagon after the crash. A
further analysis will show
that this space is around 70 m
long. |
|
Frame 2 |
 |
The supposed tail of the
plane has disappeared. The
explosion blast comes out from
the pentagon front. The white
color, as explained by a French
explosives
expert indicates the
presence of a very fast
propagating explosion front,
caused by a solid explosive
and not at all the burning of kerosene.
Compare with the orange /
black explosion cloud produced
by the planes on the wtc
towers.
Note also that the white track
(vortex or engine smoke)
extends now to the left up to
the point where it disappears
in the explosion front. If it
has been caused by the plane,
it must have gone through this
space. |
|
Frame 3 |
 |
The explosion blast extends.
The white color has been
replaced now by a nice red.
Sign that very hot gases
expand.
Note also that the white track
has quite disappeared on the
right of the yellow cabinet,
which seems to prove that it
was a vortex rather than smoke
from an engine. The extension
of the explosion front, from
the previous frame, could be
estimated between 20 and 30
meters, by reference to the
pentagon front height (24 m).
Divided by sound propagation
speed in air (300 m/s), this
gives a delay between 66 ms
and 100 ms. This would give
frame rates of, respectively
15 and 10 frames / second : a
rate lower than standard video
cameras (25 or 30 frames /
second), but classical for
surveillance cctv cameras
which often operate at these
slower rates.
|
Why there are "lost"
frames
If we don't focus on the assumed
presence of a flying object having
caused this explosion but only on the
explosion itself, frames 1 and 2 can't
be in succession in the film,
separated by 100 ms. Assuming that the
blast propagation in the air occurs at
a rather regular speed, close from the
sound speed in the air (300 m/s), we
should see at least one frame showing
the beginning of the explosion,
perhaps more !
Why, if there is no lost frame,
this can't be a 757
Assuming that there are no lost
frames, and that a 757 has moved from
frame 1 (hidden by yellow cabinet) to
frame 2 (masked by explosion) between
frame 1 and 2, in 66 to 100 ms, we
must admit that this plane has covered
a distance equal to :
L + S
L = 40 m : It's length to appear
completely at the left of the yellow
cabinet
S = 40 m (minimum) 70 m minus the
radius of the fireball
The speed of the 757 should so be at
least 80 m in 100 ms, which gives a
speed of 800 m/s, or 2880 km/h (mach
2.5). I suppose it's not even
necessary to ask the engineers of
Boeing to know if this is possible.
If this was a 757, how many frames
have been lost ?
If we assume that the 757 was about
full speed, 900 km/h, or 250 m/s, the
necessary time to fly over 80 m is 320
ms. This means that three frames have
been lost. There is, obviously, a
total lack of chance to loose the
three frames of this video on which
the 757 could be seen, crossing
majestuously the space between the
yellow cabinet and the pentagon, and
crashing itself on the wall of the
pentagon !
Why it can't be a 757
Thierry Meyssan first emitted this
"missing 757" theory in his
book
"L'effroyable imposture",
followed by
Pentagate.
The severe attacks against the
person of Thierry Meyssan, more than
against his theory, have reinforced
this theory to the eyes of those who
know what are the usual way of doing
of "under control medias".
From an engineer's point of view,
it is obvious that it could not be a
757 seeing the web site of :
XOX
, who made a fantastic 3D
reconstitution : see for example image
below. The cross-bars in some windows
are not even broken at the exact place
where the plane wings should have hit
the building !
See also aerial photo on "defenselink"
web site :
From the same point of view, the
way materials of a 100 tons plane
should move and what destruction they
should cause in a crash against a
building like the pentagon reinforce
this impossibility.
Taking as references images of
crashes against buildings, (the El Al
747 in Amsterdam -
crash
description,
photos
-,
Concorde
of Air France at Roissy), it seems
evident that the scene of the Pentagon
and surroundings after the crash (the
lawn intact, ...) is not the scene of
a 757 crash. See one of the first
photos taken after the crash (the
firemen have not yet arrived), with
it's situation perspective : in yellow
the edges of the photo, in violet the
plane's trajectory.
The approach of a 757 towards this
building leave a lot of questions
unanswered (realism of the approach
trajectory, position of the impact
point, no track of the landing gear on
the
grass
though it gets down automatically near
the ground, ...).
This would explain why these frames
have been "lost" : they are
those on which one can recognize that
it this not this airliner which hit
the pentagon. The first to claim for
this theory was the French journalist
Thierry Meyssan : according to him,
something (a missile, a remotely
piloted plane) was directed on the
pentagon, in order to increase the
gravity of the attack of Bin Laden on
9/11, the pentagon being a military
target. The various materials
available, including the cctv images
released by the DOD must be analyzed
carefully, in order to try to confirm
or infirm this hypothesis.
Analysis of image 1 of the cctv.
Here below the image, with art
lines added in yellow. The presumed
trajectory of the plane has been cut
into three zones :
- From the right edge of image up
to the yellow cabinet (35 pixels,
6,2 % of image width).
- Behind the yellow cabinet (46
pixels, 8,1%).
- From the yellow cabinet up to
the front of the pentagon (89
pixels, 15,6%).
The camera's horizon has been drawn on
the image, and also the realist
approach trajectory in violet (see
below in the text).
The following image is extracted
from an aerial view. Over it have been
drawn the lines corresponding to the
lateral limits of the cctv field. A
line has been plotted, perpendicular
to the axis of the camera, which
corresponds to a vertical plane
homothetic to the sensor of the
camera. On this line have been
reported the percentages measured on
the previous image. Drawing the lines
from the camera up to this line, the
trajectory of the plane (confirmed by
the destroying in the pentagon and the
struck lamp poles) is intersected.
On this trajectory can be found :
- 95 m above the road, which is
around 6 m higher than the ground
of the heliport. The plane flies
at the height of the upper part of
the lamp poles which are located
on the border of this road.
- 65 m of embankment, to join the
level of the heliport (slope 10%).
- 28 m above the heliport, in the
visible zone on the right of the
yellow cabinet on image 1.
- 35 m hidden behind the yellow
cabinet.
- 72 m up to the impact point on
the pentagon front, seen at the
left of the yellow cabinet
- 84 m of deep penetration inside
the pentagon, from the front up to
the last "punch out"
hole out of C ring.
These distances can be reported on
a cut drawing along the presumed
trajectory of the plane (in violet).
Lamp poles have been plotted in blue,
and the horizon of the cctv camera in
yellow : an horizontal plane 1.3 m
high above the heliport ground.
Facts :
- The smoke on the right of the
yellow cabinet on image 1 is 7
pixels high, i.e. 5 m at the
distance where it is seen from the
camera (275 m).
- The horizon line is at around
1.3 m from ground (height of
camera).
- This smoke being below the
horizon line, it so
"penetrates" inside the
ground of around 4 m.
- The approximate trajectory
underlined by this smoke implies
that the plane, after having flown
over the road (approximately at
the height of the top of the lamp
poles) has taken a steep descent
along the embankment (on 65 m) and
has made a brutal pitch change to
fly under a level of 1.3 m above
the ground (4 feet), and this up
to the pentagon's front.
- On Ron Harvey's web site, it is
shown that the lamp pole which is
precisely at the bottom of this
embankment, on the limit of the
heliport, has been touched
(apparently on it's upper part).
Conclusions :
- The smoke made by a plane
(vortex of exhaust) cannot extend
below ground level : it is faked.
- A plane cannot at the same time
hit the top of a lamp pole, at
around 10 m above ground and fly
under a level of 1.3 m above
ground.
- Whatever is the model of plane
or missile, fly down an embankment
and instantly take an horizontal
flight level under 1.3 m from
ground is impossible.
- If we add that the plane is said
to be a Boeing 757 and the
presumed pilot, Hani Hanjour, had
been considered by his instructors
as unable to land with a Cessna
172, this could be a good joke if
there was not the circumstances,
the number of victims and the
consequences.
- The pseudo trajectory that
suggests the smoke is indeed an
ascending trajectory regarding to
the horizon line : the
unidentified flying object should
fly under the ground level before
emerging from the grass of the
embankment, at the limit of the
heliport, and then keep on
ascending to go and hit the
pentagon's front at a few meters
height above the ground !
- The only realistic trajectory is
the one plotted in violet. A 757
would have to fly around 150 m
from the apparition of it's nose
on the right of the image up to
the disappearance of it's tail
inside the explosion fireball of
image 2, flying over the yellow
cabinet and not behind it. At a
speed of 250 m/s, it would have
needed 600 ms to do it : the cctv
camera could not miss it.
The fraud :
- The smoke which seems to be left
by the plane on images 1 and 2 has
been made by an infographist who
had no idea of perspective and 3D
construction. See the realist
trajectory in violet.
- The tail of a virtual plane has
been drawn over the yellow
cabinet. The presence of this tail
and of the smoke are intended to
prove that there has been a plane
and that, unfortunately, the
camera could not see it.
- The images can have been cropped
on the right, to avoid to show the
lamp pole (must be just on the
right of the image edge), the
embankment and the bridge over the
highway.
- Adding this smoke on images 1
and 2, and an artificial black
horizontal band on images 3, 4 and
5 allows to hide the downer part
of this embankment.
- Either the camera was tilted on
it's support in the booth (which
is possible), or the image has
been rotated by software to let
the horizon line be ascending from
the left to the right, which gives
the illusion that the trajectory
corresponding to the smoke is
horizontal or a little descending,
though it is geometrically
ascending.
- As I already stated on my former
web site, several frames have been
lost on which the flying object
must be seen flying to the
pentagon and hitting it.
Analysis of image 2 of cctv
An excellent paper can be found in
the Guardian's
analysis, discussing the explosion
at the pentagon, with a plot showing
that the red color seen ahead of the
heliport control tower is faked and
has been added by an infographist.
I don't agree with this analysis and I
think that, except the virtual smoke
left by the virtual plane, this image
is true, here is why.
Facts :
- The move of the camera inside
the booth is very realistic. The
camera bounces on it's support
when the shockwave created by the
explosion arrives at this place.
This shockwave propagates at a
speed between 2000 and 6000 m/s,
which are the speeds inside ground
of different types of seismic
waves. The explosion takes place
at around 180 m from the camera.
The seismic waves need between 30
and 90 ms (milliseconds) to
propagate to the camera.
If the camera bounces 1 cm over
it's support, the time necessary
for reaching the upper part of
this bounce is 45 ms. For 2 cm, 64
ms. For 5 cm, 101 ms. In the
hypothesis of a fast compression
seismic wave and a 1 cm bounce,
image 2 has been shot 75 ms after
the explosion. In the hypothesis
of a slower transversal seismic
wave and a camera bounce of 5 cm,
image 2 has been shot 191 ms after
the explosion.
- The front of the extending
fireball that develops on a quasi
spherical way from the explosion
point moves at a trans-sonic speed
(300 m/s). It's extension can be
estimated two times the height of
the pentagon (24 m), ie around 48
m. The time elapsed from the
explosion is so around 160 ms,
perhaps a little less if we
consider that in the first 20 m of
the fireball extension the speed
is supersonic : considering a
delay between 100 and 160 ms seems
obvious.
- The red color that can be seen
on the right of the fireball near
the ground and ahead of the
heliport control tower corresponds
to the presence of a very hot
plasma which ionizes air. This
plasma is created by the plasma
jet created by a hollow charge of
explosives, traveling at speeds
around 20 times the sonic speed,
i.e. 6000 m/s. This jet being
directed towards the inner part of
the building, what can be seen
outside is made of particles
reflected by collisions with
building parts (pillars, walls)
and getting off the building
through the openings. The direct
trajectory of this plasma before
being reflected is around 6 to 18
m, which gives a time of 1 to 3
ms. It's trajectory after
reflexion is around 30 to 50 m,
with a speed that can be estimated
reasonably between one sixth and
one half of the initial speed,
i.e. 1000 to 3000 m/s, which gives
a reflected fly time comprised between
10 and 50 ms. The total time
elapsed between the hollow charge
explosion and the arrival of an ionized
plasma on the zone ahead the
control tower must be comprised between
7 and 53 ms.
Conclusions :
- It is probable, if image 2 is
not faked, that a strong hollow
charge has exposed, sending a
plasma jet at high speed inside
the building.
- The demonstration presented in
the Guardian's paper, according to
which these red clouds are faked,
because would need a faster travel
than the front of propagation of
the fireball are just a
misunderstanding of the fact that
the plasma jets created by a
hollow charge travel very fast.
- If the probable delay between
the explosion and image 2 is to be
considered from 100 to 150 ms, it
can be concluded that the red
color ahead the control tower is
made of tracks of plasma fading,
or that the need for this plasma
to get out from the building
through it's openings (said to be
particularly reinforced), or the
existence of multi-travels inside
the building, have delayed it so
that it propagates there 100 or
150 ms later.
- If an infographist is dumb
enough to try to make us believe
that a plane can fly under the
ground level, it is highly improbable
that he is not able to invent
realistic physical effects such as
the high speed propagation of
seismic shockwaves or ionized
plasma.
The fraud :
- As was demonstrated on image 1,
the trajectory of the virtual
plane showed by the virtual smoke
is not realistic : this smoke has
been made by infography.
- As on image 1, the horizon line
is not horizontal.
- This image should be the fifth
or the sixth of the series, even
more if the plane had a speed
estimated around 600 km/h, as some
witnesses said.
Analysis of the "red
letters" wreckage pieces
Mark Faram and several other
persons have shot pictures of this
wreckage piece on the awn of the
pentagon. It can be found also on a
live video from CBS.
Mark Faram, one of the
photographer, explained in what
circumstances
he had seen and photographed this
piece. It's presence on several photos
shot by several people seems to
authentify it.
An analysis of the possible
position of the red letter with a
round edge and a white border, in the
lateral marking of the Boeing 757 lost
by American Airlines shows that only a
few zones are in correspondence : see
the image below extracted of the
analysis of Sarah
Roberts.
On this image, I have added, in
yellow, the marking of the radius of
the round edge. I estimate it around
60 cm, regarding the height of a
window of the cabin (~40 cm) and to
the height of the plane's door (~2m).
The problem here is the scale. If
we analyze the picture below, it is
obvious that the wreckage piece is
ahead of the red pick-up which is
visible on the left of the picture. I
have drawn, on a selection of this
picture, a comparison of the radius of
the wheel of this pick-up and of the
round edge of the red letter. I
estimate this radius from 20 to 30 cm.
This can be confirmed by examining
another piece of wreckage, on which
appears the "C" letter.
Comparing the size of this letter with
the width of the door on the control
tower wall (~70 cm), it seems that the
size of this "C" letter is
around 60 cm. This is to be compared
with the size of the "C"
letter, around 1.5 m, on the body of
the B 757.
Facts :
- The presence of these wreckage
pieces on several pictures
authentify them.
- The radius of the edge of the
red letter is two to three times
smaller that the one found in the
logos "American
Airlines" painted on the
Boeing 757.
- The "C" letter on the
wrecked piece is 2.5 times smaller
than the "C" letter on
the body of the B 757.
- The witnesses can be divided
into two groups : those who
perceived the average dimensions
of the plane and have seen a small
commuter jet, and those who
perceived the logo and colors, the
general appearance of the plane,
and recognized a B 757 or an
Airbus of American Airlines.
Conclusions :
- Somebody painted an
"American" logo two to
three times smaller than a B757
one's on the body of the plane
which dived into the pentagon.
- If this logo has been painted
two to three times smaller, it is
because this plane was about two
to three times smaller than a B
757 and that it was a trick to
make it seen as the flight 77 for
somebody looking at it from far
away.
- All witnesses have seen the same
plane, but it is so highly
unthinkable that a small plane
could be disguised to look like an
American Airlines airliner that nobody
thought one second to this hypotheses.
Analysis of the engine wreckage
pieces
The picture below shows interesting
wreckage pieces.
A rotor (high pressure stage)
coming from an jet engine can be seen.
On the top left of the image, what
seems to be the housing of this
engine. On the right, the leg of
somebody working on the site gives
approximately the scale.
Facts :
- this is a high pressure rotor
element of a jet engine
- the diameter of the housing is
not much bigger than the diameter
of this rotor,
- most of the witnesses heard a
sound that they describe as the
sound of a military aircraft
(highly pitched and strident), not
the sound of an airliner.
Conclusion :
- this piece and the housing
behind don't come from the engine
of an airliner, which has low
pressure fans of much larger size
than the high pressure rotors, so
that the housings are much larger
than the diameters of the high
pressure rotors.
- The engines of this plane had no
low pressure fans : they are
military engines, for which noise
is not a problem.
The fraud :
- This photo proves that internal
jet engines pieces survived the
crash and didn't vaporize, as was
stupidly said. See the photos of
Air
France Concorde (BEA photo)
which disintegrated and burnt
against a building.
- Where are the others pieces of
the engine ?
- Where are the pieces of the
other engine if this plane had
really two of them ?
This would need to be confirmed by the
engineers in Pratt & Whitney or
another company making these sort of
engines. BTW, the rotor shown is
really a characteristic piece : I
don't understand, if it was a piece of
a B 757, that in any part of the world
lot of people wouldn't have already
recognized it. Would it be a part
coming from a military engine ? Which
web site will come first with a
picture of this rotor shot at
manufacturing or at maintenance stage
?
Analysis of other wreckage pieces
The photo below shows an
interesting wreckage piece.
Facts :
- This piece seems correspond to a
mobile organ on the plane (flaps,
...).
- It is very characteristic : any
person having seen it during
manufacturing or maintenance
should be able to recognize it.
Conclusion :
- If the official information
services from the DOD don't have
yet claimed to the media that
"this piece of wreckage is
(for example) the movement
transmission for the left flap
servo-command of a B 757", it
is probably because this doesn't
come from a B 757...
The cruise missile theory
What flying object could it be ? Hypotheses
: it is an AGM 86 cruise missile.
Source :
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/bomber/calcm.htm
The model on the left would be more
suitable. The two red military loads
inside the missile are (
broach
type, see
description
) :
- On the front a conventional
explosive, shaped as an
"hollow charge", whose
aim is to dig a hole in a wall,
but limited to a few meter in
action.
- On the back, an uranium load.
This metal has the property to
explode when projected on solid
materials, creating a plasma
inside which the mass of metal
propagates. On a smaller scale,
this principle is used to destroy
tanks.
This type of missile and charge would
explain the traces on the pentagon
building :
- visible limited destruction
where the two short wings of the
missile hit the front of the
building
- 4 x 4 m hole in the front :
where the hollow charge exploded.
- important wreckage in the first
building : action zone of the
hollow charge
- small (2 m diameter) and nicely
dug holes in the inner buildings
and their walls : action of the
uranium load.
Arguments for the "cruise
missile theory"
What pushes to think that this
could be an AGM 86 cruise missile with
an uranium load is the fact that the
ground in front of the explosion site
was covered of sand very quickly after
the crash :
The good reason could be to protect
people from the remains of this metal,
known to cause
severe
long term intoxications (also
known as the "gulf war syndrome"),
and/or a way do make the proofs of the
presence of uranium disappear. Note
that there should be in that case lot
of it on the shoes and dining room
carpet of all those (firemen, rescue
teams) who went on this site before it
was covered by sand. Specialized teams
in charge of taking the debris out of
the building, later, were dressed with
protection clothes and decontaminate
themselves after working on the site.
Another argument is the noise
produced by the object, said to be
very strident by the witnesses, as
this of a fighter or a missile and not
like the noise of a big airliner.
Several witnesses, among whose
experimented military experts located
inside the pentagon, have reported to
feel the explosion like a heavy bomb
explosion (noise, shockwave, thermal
wave, smell of cordite), and not as
the impression of the crash of a
plane.
Donald Rumsfeld himself had a slip
of the tongue and referred to a
missile hitting the Pentagon.
Arguments agains the "cruise
missile" theory
- The plane which has hit the
pentagon had a long approach
trajectory, flying along a quasi
perfect 270° turn over the city,
followed by a linear final
approach. None of the witnesses
has described a cruise missile,
except some of them saying that it
finally ran straight into the
pentagon as if it was
electronically locked onto it's
target.
- The witnesses can be divided
into two groups : those who have
seen a Boeing 757 (or even an
airbus 320 said one of them), some
of them saying they had recognized
the markings of American Airlines,
and those who have seen a small
commuter jet (the necessary size
for a dozen people on board).
The false airliner theory
Let us consider the following
scenario (see complete timeline).
- Bin Laden has prepared an attack
involving four hijacked planes.
- The US official are warned of
this attack, by several channels,
the
most
serious being the minister of foreign
affairs of the Taliban regime who
tried to open by this way a negotiation
with the U.S. officials.
- It is decided to leave this
attack be held, though discretely
organizing to limit the human
losses, to create a psychological
shock on the American people and
to create the necessary conditions
to open a war in the middle east.
- On 9/11, four planes are
hijacked at the same time.
According to the
procedures,
the NORAD gets the information
from the
FAA.
- A hijacked plane hits the first
tower of wtc. Within 15 mn, almost
everybody has the information (I
had it in France at my office, the
wife of a colleague having
received a mail from somebody
watching CNN in the USA, and
having phoned to her husband).
- A second hijacked plane hits the
second tower of wtc. Everybody,
including people in France who
follow in real time the events on
internet, know that this is not an
accident but an attack.
- The NORAD, which obviously has
at least the same information than
the French public, is by some ways
locked by the conspiracy.
- An officer of the NORAD, who
doesn't know that there is a
conspiracy going on, or who didn't
want to get into it, has sent
fighters to intercept the two
others hijacked planes (flight 93
and flight 77).
- The two planes are intercepted.
They refuse to obey the visual
control signals from the fighters.
They are fired. According to some
witnesses, both of them in Pennsylvania.
More probably in the mountains of
Virginia for flight 77.
- An emergency solution has been
setup for the case where these
planes would be fired. A small
twin engine plane, with a silhouette
looking like a 757 (and the more
if seen from below) has been
prepared. Some rumors say it could
be a navy's Vicking S3 (dragon fire).
Some pieces of body have been
added or transformed to disguise
it at the best, it has been equipped
with a distance piloting equipment
(global hawk, radio command), has
been painted with the colors of
American Airlines and loaded with
a BROACH type bomb (as in the
cruise missile described above,
but perhaps greater size).
- This plane takes off from an
airport close to Washington DC (a
witness has followed it in sight
from this moment up to it's
crash).
- A C 130 flies in the
surroundings, with the pilot of
this remotely piloted plane on
it's board. It follows closely
this plane, taking in charge the
last part of the trajectory on a
video monitor.
- This video system lacking some
resolution, as the bomb plane is
set full throttle, he doesn't see
the lamp poles at the crossroads between
highways 27 and 244. The shocks
are not destructive for the plane,
but bend the lamp poles and pull
some of them out, probably causing
the bomb plane to be close to
crash on the ground of the
pentagon's heliport. The pilot
succeeds already in stabilizing
the trajectory.
- At the impact time, the C 130
veers and gets away from the
explosion.
- The hollow charge and perhaps
the energy of some heavy part of
the plane (landing gear, engines)
destroy heavily the structures of
the first pentagon building (E
ring).
- Apart from these heavy parts
(landing gear, motors), the plane
is completely destroyed,
transformed in a shower of
aluminum confettis as some witnesses
said.
- The depleted uranium load of the
bomb plays it's role of
penetration, getting deeply inside
the inner buildings, penetrating
through walls and floors.
- Within a few hours, the
officials have to understand what
exactly happened. Probably they
knew in a short delay that two of
the hijacked planes were shot by
fighters : the pilots who fired
the two airliners must have done
their reports by radio or after
landing.
- People not inside the conspiracy
but who know that two planes have
been fired must try to understand
what has hit the pentagon. They
can be confused on the total
number of hijacked planes.
- People inside the conspiracy, as
the original plan was to crash
flights 77 and 93 on Washington
DC, can think that this has really
happened and they give this
explanation to the attack.
- In a meeting, perhaps just with
military officials, perhaps
involving political authorities
like the vice president in the
white house bunker or even George
Bush in his "air force
one" plane, it is decided
that the information will not bee
given to the public that two
airliners have been shot by the
USAF. For flight 93, it will be
said that a revolt of the hijacked
passengers turned to the crash of
the plane. For flight 77, it will
be announced that it crashed on
the pentagon.
- As the evidence that flight 77
didn't crash on the pentagon takes
more and more importance in the
media, George Bush and it's team
want to maintain their official
version of the facts, stacking
bullshit over bullshit, just to
the point where it represents now
a huge heap.
Arguments for the "false
airliner theory"
All the arguments above, in favor
of the "cruise missile"
theory apply to this theory. Other
arguments can be found.
The description of a small commuter
jet that many witnesses gave.
The plane's noise, as described by
the witnesses, which indicates that
the engines are small size : the large
engines of modern airliners have a
high dilution rate which makes their
noise far less strident.
The size of this plane and it's
mass, though less than those of a 757,
could explain the location of the hit
lamp poles and their severe damages.
It's more difficult to imagine that
with a smaller and lighter cruise
missile.
A cruise missile doesn't make a
descent with a 270° turn a few
seconds before arriving on it's target
: it would make it less precise.
The Pennsylvania state police have
first reported to have two crash
sites.
Arguments against these theories
The more serious argument in favor
of the crash of a large airplane,
about 100 ft wingspan, is the analysis
of the lamp poles hit by the plane
before crashing on the pentagon : see
The
analysis of Ron Harvey. Difficult
to make one's mind about this fact
without going on the site, measuring, seeing
the lamp poles debris ... Just two
hypotheses :
- One of the lamp pole could have
been damaged by a heavy debris
thrown by the blast, coming from
inside the pentagon (piece of
concrete...) or from outside
(piece of a car, truck or
helicopter).
- The hole dug by the explosion
into the pentagon has the shape of
a cylinder. The blast creates a shock
wave towards the exterior,
precisely guided by this cylinder.
This shock wave could have
propagate to the lamp poles, which
are precisely on the axis of this
cylinder, and damage one or
several of them.
If one lamp pole or more have been
damaged without having been directly
hit by the plane, there could be no
conclusion about the plane's size.
Looking carefully to the images on Ron
Harvey's web site, it seems to be the
case for pole N° 2, (now number 4,
after Ron Harvey modified his web
site) which lays on the grass at
some distance (10 m ?) from it's
original position, in the opposite
direction of the pentagon.
Analyses / links
It is possible to have more
technical information about the
pentagon crash, surfing on the
following web sites :
Political arguments can be found on
the following sites, much of them
being oriented towards a
"conspiracy theory" :
Since it is known that the Japanese
attack on
Pearl
Harbor was foreseen, and that the
FBI ordered and organized JF Kennedy
murder, there is no obvious reason to
give any credit to the administration
and government of the US. 9/11 attack
and the cover-up which followed it,
including the infamous "patriot
act", are just like a remake of
these scandals. In other words, there
have been precedents in history which
prove that there can be such conspiracies
/ public opinion manipulations from US
officials.
Consequences
The theories described above are
technically realistic. If one of them
is true, it implies that the US
officials were warned of Bin Laden
plans, but decided to leave them
executed (same scenario as for
Pearl
Harbor). The fact that a cruise
missile or a specially disguised plane
would have been prepared to crash onto
the pentagon, in case where flights 77
and 93 couldn't fulfill their suicide
mission, would prove that the
conspiracy was setup long before the September
11 dramatic events.
The fact that flights 93 and 77
have been deliberately
"neutralized" by the air
force, and the will to hide this fact
to the public could be understood. The
pain for the victims families is less
important if they think that their
relatives died from the direct or
indirect action of terrorists, rather
than from the action of an American
fighter. But it would be crazy and
completely unreal to think that, to
hide that these planes have been fired
by necessity, the pentagon should be
attacked with a depleted uranium bomb
!
There can be questions also to whether
or not a conspiracy involved the Bush
government and civil officials, or was
limited to military circles. It could,
in this later case, be linked to the
"war
declaration" of defense
secretary Donald Rumsfeld to the
pentagon bureaucracy, on September 10
: the day before the attack !
The main problem today is that a
growing number of persons, outside the
USA first, and now inside, consider
that there has been a conspiracy and a
cover-up.
If this is the truth, George bush
and/or some of his administration
members should be considered like
Saddam Hussein, i.e. being able to
mass murder their own people for
internal politics and/or strategic
goals : control the American people
and press the country into a war
clearly intended to control a vital
energy source on the long term.
It's time to say the truth. The
best way would be for the FBI / DOD to
- release the missing frames of
the above video
-
release the cctv video of the
"mysterious hotel" (the Sheraton
National ?) known to have been
viewed by the hotel employees,
shocking them. See point of view,
the pentagon being just on the
left of the picture or from the
window ...
-
release the NEXCOMM/CITGO-gas
station video : see point of view
...,
source
and
witnessing.
- Release other videos or photos
like
the
Virginia department of
transports's, or from the
sites over which "flight
77" flew on 9/11.
- allow independent experts to
examine the debris of the crash on
the pentagon, with witnesses
having gathered these debris to
identify them,
- conducts a public enquiry in Pennsylvania
and Virginia to find the sites of
crash,
- make some holes in the newly
brought materials on the pentagon
helicopter field, down to the
original soil, and verify that
there is no uranium on it.
Public opinion, inside the United
States and outside, must ask the
United States senate and Congress to
open an investigation on pentagon
crash. Senators and congressmen must
know the truth. They must know how and
why the Bush administration has
engaged their country into dreadfull
conflicts in the middle east. Sign the
petition
on line !
This web site is dedicated to all
the victims of 9/11/2001 attack.
Jean-Pierre Desmoulins, planet
|
