Genes From Engineered Grass Spread for Miles, Study
Finds
By ANDREW POLLACK
Published: September 21, 2004
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/21/business/21grass.html?th (must
register to view original article)
A new study shows that genes from genetically engineered grass can
spread much farther than previously known, a finding that raises
questions about the straying of other plants altered through
biotechnology and that could hurt the efforts of two companies to win
approval for the first bioengineered grass.
The two companies, Monsanto and Scotts, have developed a strain of
creeping bentgrass for use on golf courses that is resistant to the
widely used herbicide Roundup. The altered plants would allow
groundskeepers to spray the herbicide on their greens and fairways to
kill weeds while leaving the grass unscathed.
But the companies' plans have been opposed by some environmental groups
as well as by the federal Forest Service and the Bureau of Land
Management. Critics worry that the grass could spread to areas where it
is not wanted or transfer its herbicide resistance to weedy relatives,
creating superweeds that would be immune to the most widely used weed
killer. The Forest Service said earlier this year that the grass "has
the potential to adversely impact all 175 national forests and
grasslands."
Some scientists said the new results, to be published online this week
by the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, did not
necessarily raise alarms about existing genetically modified crops like
soybeans, corn, cotton and canola. There are special circumstances, they
say, that make the creeping bentgrass more environmentally worrisome,
like its extraordinarily light pollen.
Because Scotts has plans to develop other varieties of bioengineered
grasses for use on household lawns, the new findings could have
implications well beyond the golf course. And the study suggests that
some previous studies of the environmental impact of genetically
modified plants have been too small to capture the full spread of
altered genes.
Scotts says that because naturally occurring bentgrass has not caused
major weed problems, the bioengineered version would pose no new
hazards. And any Roundup-resistant strains that might somehow develop
outside of intentionally planted areas could be treated with other weed
killers, the company said.
In the new study, scientists with the Environmental Protection Agency
found that the genetically engineered bentgrass pollinated test plants
of the same species as far away as they measured -about 13 miles
downwind from a test farm in Oregon. Natural growths of wild grass of a
different species were pollinated by the gene-modified grass nearly nine
miles away.
Previous studies had measured pollination between various types of
genetically modified plants and wild relatives at no more than about one
mile, according to the paper.
"It's the longest distance gene-flow study that I know of," said Norman
C. Ellstrand, an expert on this subject at the University of California,
Riverside, who was not involved in the study but read the paper.
"The gene really is essentially going to get out," he added. "What this
study shows is it's going to get out a lot faster and a lot further than
people anticipated."
One reason the grass pollen was detected so far downwind was the size of
the farm - 400 acres with thousands of plants. Most previous studies of
gene flow have been done on far smaller fields, meaning there was less
pollen and a lower chance that some would travel long distances. Those
small studies, the new findings suggest, might not accurately reflect
what would happen once a plant covers a large area.
"This is one of the first really realistic studies that has been done,"
said Joseph K. Wipff, an Oregon grass breeder. Dr. Wipff was not
involved in the latest study but had conducted an earlier one that found
pollen from genetically engineered grass traveling only about 1,400
feet. That test, though, used less than 300 plants covering one-tenth of
an acre.
The effort to commercialize the bentgrass has attracted attention
because it raises issues somewhat different from those surrounding the
existing genetically modified crops.
It would be the first real use of genetic engineering in a suburban
setting, for example, rather than on farms. And the grass is perennial,
while corn, soybeans, cotton and canola are planted anew each year,
making them easier to control.
Bentgrass can also cross-pollinate with at least 12 other species of
grass, while the existing crops, except for canola, have no wild
relatives in the places they are grown in the United States. And crops
like corn and soybeans have trouble surviving off the farm, while grass
can easily survive in the wild.
The bentgrass, moreover, besides having very light pollen - a cloud can
be seen rising from grass farms - has very light seeds that disperse
readily in the wind. It can also reproduce asexually using stems that
creep along the ground and establish new roots, giving rise to its name.
Because of the environmental questions, the application for approval of
the bioengineered bentgrass is encountering delays at the Department of
Agriculture, which must decide whether to allow the plant to be
commercialized.
After hearing public comments earlier this year, the department has now
decided to produce a full environmental impact statement, which could
take a year or more, according to Cindy Smith, who is in charge of
biotech regulation.
Ms. Smith, in an interview yesterday, said the new study "gives some
preliminary information that's different from previous studies that
we're aware of." But more conclusive research is needed, she said.
Bentgrass is already widely used in its nonengineered form by golf
course operators, mainly for greens but also for fairways and tee areas,
in part because it is sturdy even when closely mown. It is rarely used
on home lawns because it must be cared for intensively. And creeping
bentgrass does not cross-pollinate with the types of grass typically
used on lawns, scientists said.
Executives at Scotts, a major producer of lawn and turf products based
in Marysville, Ohio, said the genetically engineered bentgrass would be
sold only for golf courses. They said golf courses cut their grass so
often that the pollen-producing part of the plants would never develop.
And because nonengineered creeping bentgrass has not caused weed
problems despite being used on golf courses for decades, they said, the
genetically modified version would pose no new problems.
"There has been pollen flow but it has not created weeds," Michael P.
Kelty, the executive vice president and vice chairman of Scotts, said in
an interview yesterday. He said Scotts and Monsanto, the world's largest
developer of genetically modified crops, had spent tens of millions of
dollars since 1998 developing the bioengineered bentgrass.
The questions about the grass come after Monsanto, which is based in St.
Louis, said earlier this year that it was dropping its effort to
introduce the world's first genetically engineered wheat, citing
concerns by farmers that its use in foods might face market opposition.
Scotts is also developing genetically modified grass for home lawns,
like herbicide-tolerant and slow-growing types that would need less
mowing. But those products still need several more years of testing, Dr.
Kelty said, adding that the company would avoid types of grass that
could become weeds. "We don't want to put a product out there that is
going to be a threat," he said.
Scotts and Monsanto have received some support for their argument from
the Weed Science Society of America, a professional group, which
conducted a review of the weed tendencies of creeping bentgrass and its
close relatives at the request of the Department of Agriculture.
"In the majority of the country these species have not presented
themselves as a significant weed problem, historically," said Rob
Hedberg, director of science policy for the society, summarizing the
conclusions of the review. He said that because people have generally
not tried to control bentgrass and similar species with Roundup, known
generically as glyphosate, "the inability to control them with this
herbicide is a less significant issue."
Still, the society's report noted that bentgrass could be considered a
weed by farms that are trying to grow other grass seeds. And the Forest
Service, in comments to the Agriculture Department earlier this year,
said that bentgrass has threatened to displace native species in some
national forests.
John M. Randall, acting director of the Invasive Species Initiative at
the Nature Conservancy, said bentgrass and related species had been a
threat to native grasses in certain preserves that the group helps
manage, including a couple near Montauk Point on eastern Long Island.
Other opponents of the genetically modified grass seized on the results.
"This does confirm what a lot of people feared - expected, really," said
Margaret Mellon, director of the food and environment program for the
Union of Concerned Scientists in Washington. "These kinds of distances
are eye-popping."
The new study was done by Lidia S. Watrud and colleagues at an E.P.A.
research center in Corvallis, Ore., who were trying to develop new
methods to assess gene flow, not specifically to study the bentgrass.
They put out 178 potted and unmodified creeping bentgrass plants, which
they called sentinel plants, at various distances around the test farm.
They also surveyed wild bentgrass and other grasses. They collected more
than a million seeds from the plants, growing them into seedlings to
test for herbicide resistance and doing genetic tests.
The number of seeds found to be genetically engineered was only 2
percent for the sentinel plants, 0.03 percent for wild creeping
bentgrass and 0.04 percent for another wild grass. Most of those seeds
were found in the first two miles or so, with the number dropping
sharply after that. Still, said Anne Fairbrother, one of the authors of
the report, finding even some cross pollination at 13 miles "is a
paradigm shift in how far pollen might move."
|