"Follow the money"
...That
Mysterious Building 7
I’ve heard several explanations as to why
Building 7 absolutely had to be demolished —
and given the way it was achieved, at
obviously great risk to the perps.
One of these is that Giuliani’s
ultra-fortified “emergency” bunker on the
23rd floor served as an operations center,
contained the guidance electronics for the
incoming aircraft, and this evidence had to
be destroyed. I don’t find this line of
reasoning entirely implausible — for
instance, I’ve seen plotted extensions of
the approach tracks of both aircraft that
neatly intersect building 7 from opposing
directions. But I’d be the first to admit
this sort of conjecture hardly constitutes
proof.
Regardless, what remains inarguable is that
this structure absolutely had to be
brought down. It clearly contained hugely
incriminating material of some kind that had
to be shredded at any cost. If this weren’t
the case, the perps wouldn’t have risked a
blatantly obvious ‘pull’ in broad daylight
for the world to record as probably the most
compelling smoking gun of them all.
I now concur with a few colleagues that the
plan called for Flight 93 to crash into Bld
7. The ensuing high-visibility fireball
would’ve rather neatly ‘explained’ that
tower’s collapse, case closed. But the
script somehow went awry, and that errant
aircraft was ordered shot down over
Shanksville before matters got totally out
of hand. This, of course, left the perps
with no choice but to pull the building
several hours later — doubtless cursing to
high heaven and at Murphy — in full public
view.
That being said, I believe the following
article helps shed more light on the
importance of this enigmatic building, and
perhaps provide another reason why it had to
be destroyed — Documents.
You see, Building 7, which also housed field
offices of the SEC, FBI, CIA, NSA among
others, contained tons of information on
corporate fraud that could, collectively,
have constituted manifold ‘Enrons’ that
would’ve put many, many individuals away for
a few hundred years.
I suspect much of what Sibel Edmonds has
been barred from disclosing has a lot to do
with this information — fraud, laundering,
gun-running, narcotics, etc. If one were to
read between Sibel’s lines in the few
interviews she gave before she was totally
gagged, I believe this would all soon begin
to ring true.
Similarly, the offices that were the target
of the missile that struck the Pentagon were
those of the auditors digging into
the missing $2.6 trillion.
They were all killed in the strike. All
records were destroyed.
Barbara Honnegar, who spoke at the
conference in Los Angeles last Sunday (with
Ed Asner and David Griffin), said she had
interviewed an individual who occupied an
adjacent office who actually saw banks of
computers in the general vicinity of the
accounting offices literally going up in
smoke — self-detonating, as it were —
seconds before the initial explosion
(yes, there was an explosion that preceded
the missile by a few minutes; that’s when
the numerous fallen wall clocks froze in
mid-stroke. Hmmm... evokes memories of that
explosion beneath Willy Rodriguez’s feet in
the WTC basement seconds before the aircraft
impact on the Tower, does it not?).
Then we have the billions of dollars in
insider trading... the tons of bullion being
frantically trucked out of the vaults
beneath the towers...
This all rather eerily prompts me to recall
the piece of sage advice that enigmatic
diplomat in Prague gave me some months ago:
“Follow the money.”
“It’s
devastating. They’ll have to scrap many
cases, and start from scratch on others”
-- Carmen
Lawrence, ex-SEC head
########################################################
"The whole idea of the pancake theory and this
progressive collapse that NIST talks about means
that you have no resistance on the way down...what
an amazing thing that all of the bolts would
have failed at the same time. All of the welds
would have failed at the same time...And there isn't
even
an explanation for how the core of the structure —
an extremely highly structurally-resisting part of
the
structure that basically takes the lateral loading —
collapsed. NIST just talk about the trusses
that go across from column to column. And all of
them fail at the same time? Even if you were to
accept that, you've got resistance as the floors
come down. And they did an analysis there,
... It should have taken 96 seconds for that total
collapse to have occurred in a pancake
manner down to ground zero. It took 9. I think
Building 7 is the big, big question mark
and I don't know that there is an engineering
explanation for that other than controlled
demolition."
-- Robert M. Korol, BA Sc, MA Sc, PhD, PE,
F.C.S.C.E. – Professional Engineer and Professor
Emeritus,
Department of Civil Engineering, McMaster
University. Elected Fellow of the Engineering
Institute of Canada
for exceptional contributions to engineering in
Canada. Well known for his research on steel
structures;
the plastic theory of metal structures, inelastic
buckling, limit analysis, environmental assessment
and life cycle analysis methodologies.
http://www.patriotsquestion911.com
Demand a
new investigation.
Stand up. Be counted.
|