PRESS
ADVISORY: TURF to introduce NEW
EVIDENCE against TxDOT!
PRESS ADVISORY
Contact: Terri Hall,
Founder/Executive Director
Texans Uniting for Reform & Freedom
(TURF)
PHONE: (210) 275-0640
EMAIL:
terri@texasturf.org
WEB:
http://www.TexasTURF.org
TURF
to present NEW evidence at today's
hearing in lawsuit to STOP TxDOT’s
illegal lobbying & ad campaign
In Travis County
District Court before Judge
Orlinda Naranjo
on
Thursday, October 18, 2007 at 2 PM,
Texans Uniting for Reform and Freedom
(TURF) has asked for a
motion to reconsider
the Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to
immediately halt the illegal advertising
and lobbying by the Texas Department of
Transportation (TxDOT) contained in the
original petition (http://texasturf.org/images/stories/pdf/POP-and-App-for-TRO.pdf)
in light of
NEW EVIDENCE
obtained through the Public Information
Act.
An August 13, 2007 memorandum (http://texasturf.org/images/stories/pdf/KTM-memo.pdf)
by Defendant Coby Chase confirms that
TxDOT intends to spend public money for
the political purpose of influencing
upcoming public hearings for Trans Texas
Corridor 69, and that the Keep Texas
Moving campaign will continue into 2008.
TURF's attorneys
Charlie Riley, David
Van Os,
and
Andrew Hawkins
have also asked for a continuance of the
hearing for today’s scheduled plea to
the jurisdiction since
TxDOT has failed and refused to provide
all documents
responsive to Plaintiff’s Public
Information Act Request, thus preventing
the opportunity to conduct written
discovery and depositions.
WHO:
Texas taxpayers through TURF
WHAT:
Lawsuit seeking injunction to halt
TxDOT’s taxpayer-funded illegal ad
campaign & lobbying activities
WHEN:
Thursday,
October 18, 2007@ 2 PM
WHERE:
Travis County District Court before
Judge Orlinda Naranjo, 1000 Guadalupe,
Austin, Texas
HOW:
The press needs to register request for
cameras in the courtroom in advance
through the court clerk. Contact Warren
Vavra
at (512) 854-9093 for more information.
This lawsuit is brought pursuant to §
37, Texas Civil Practice and Remedies
Code. TxDOT’s expenditure of public
funds for the Keep Texas Moving campaign
is illegal, and an injunction
prohibiting any further illegal
expenditures in this regard.
TxDOT has violated § 556.004 of the
Texas Government Code by directing the
expenditure of public funds for
political advocacy in support of toll
roads and the Trans Texas Corridor, and
have directly lobbied the United States
Congress in favor of additional toll
road programs as evidenced in its
report, Forward Momentum.
On Monday, September 24, Judge
Orlinda Naranjo did not grant a
temporary restraining order (TRO).
TxDOT unearthed a law that says they
can advertise toll roads (Sec
228.004 of Transportation Code) and
the citizens invoked another that
says they can’t (Chapter 556, Texas
Government Code). The burden to
obtain a TRO is higher than for an
injunction.
“TxDOT is waging a one-sided
political ad campaign designed to
sway public opinion in favor of the
policy that puts money in TxDOT’s
own coffers. School Boards cannot
lobby in favor of their own bond
elections, and yet TxDOT cites its
own special law to line their own
pockets at taxpayers’ expense,” says
an incredulous Terri Hall,
Founder/Director of TURF.
Hall also notes that TxDOT’s
campaign goes beyond mere
advertising, “It’s propaganda and in
some cases, the ads blatantly lie to
the public! In one radio ad (http://www.keeptexasmoving.com/index.php/stay_informed,
scroll down to radio ad “continuing
maintenance”), it claims it’s not
signing contracts with non-compete
agreements in them and yet last
March TxDOT inked a deal with
Cintra-Zachry for SH 130 (read about
it here:
http://satollparty.com/post/?p=605)
that had a non-compete clause (which
either prohibits or financially
punishes the State for building
competing infrastructure with a toll
road).”
On August 22, 2007, TURF filed a formal
complaint with Travis County District
Attorney Ronnie Earle to investigate
TxDOT’s illegal lobbying and asked him
to prosecute TxDOT for criminal
wrongdoing. See the formal complaint
here
http://texasturf.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=178&Itemid=26.
The petition before the court seeks
immediate injunctive relief in a civil
proceeding.
Updates to TURF’s petition and
supplemental affidavits will be posted
soon.
|