HIGH RANKING MILITARY OFFICERS AND AIRLINE
PILOTS AGREE THAT THE SOUTH TOWER WAS NOT HIT BY FLIGHT 175!
December 14,
2005
Contact: Dave
vonKleist 573-378-0143
Startling new revelations about the 9/11 attacks were recently released on
The Power Hour radio program.
Col. George
Nelson USAF (ret.), who has 30 years of experience identifying
aircraft and aircraft parts stated,
“The plane that hit the south tower on 9/11 was not United Airlines
(UA) flight 175”. After reviewing numerous video clips and
photographs of the 9/11 attacks, he concluded, “That was not a
commercial airliner. The planes were substituted.” (
www.thepowerhour.com/news2/replay_aug8_2005.htm ) This shocking
conclusion is also being echoed by other military officers and commercial
airline pilots.
Glen Standish,
an airline pilot for over 20 years stated, “The plane seen in
various video clips of the attack could not have been UA flight 175, due
to the extra equipment that appears to be attached to the bottom of the
fuselage”.
A mysterious
“flash” is also seen in the clips that indicate possible incendiary events
took place before the planes entered the towers.
Nila Sagadevin,
a seasoned airline pilot of over 20 years, examined photos of the engine
that was found at the Trade Center site. He stated, “The engine
found at the Trade Center was a CFM-56, which is not utilized on a Boeing
767”, confirming that the south tower was not hit by flight 175,
but by another plane that had taken its place.
Maj. Gen.
Albert Stubblebine, US Army (ret.), an expert in photo analysis, reviewed
the photos taken at the Pentagon before the collapse and concluded,
“The plane does not fit in that hole!” indicating that the damage
was inconsistent with a 757 strike.
This explosive
information not only brings into question the official story of the
September 11th attacks, but also the real motives behind the
wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the War on Terror, the beneficiaries of
government contracts, and the resulting legislation like the USA Patriot
Act that was passed without review by Congress after the 9/11 attacks.
Because an
increasing number of military personnel, civilian pilots, physicists,
educators and law enforcement officials are now questioning the official
story of hijackers responsible for the attacks on September 11th,
2001, there is a call for the re-opening of an investigation into the 911
attacks. (
www.reopen911.org
)
The video clips
and photographs examined are included in the controversial documentary,
“911 In Plane Site” a Power Hour production. (
www.911inplanesite.com )
